Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robert Gillens v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6227
Plaintiff: ROBERT BRUCE GILLENS
Defendant: MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, DOE #1, unknown mail staff/supervisor, KENNETH CRADDOCK, Discipline Hearing Officer and others
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff: ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant: Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shanda Gilyard v. Tammy Slinka
as 23-6094
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANDA L. GILYARD
Defendant / Appellee: TAMMY SLINKA, L. SMITH, P. ADAMS and others
Gilmore v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00308
Petitioner: Cynthia Gilmore
Respondent: Warden, Warden Lovette, H.L. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff: ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant: MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DOE #1, K. CRADDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donley v. McCaffrey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00132
Petitioner: Rajih Rafee Donley
Respondent: R. McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Donley v. McCaffrey
as 3:2022cv00088
Petitioner: Rajih R. Donley
Respondent: R. McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Florence Bikundi v. R. McCaffrey
as 22-6348
Petitioner / Appellant: FLORENCE BIKUNDI
Respondent / Appellee: R. MCCAFFREY, Warden FCI/SFF
Meehan v. McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00070
Petitioner: Brenda Meehan
Respondent: R. McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guzman-Beato v. McCaffrey
as 3:2022cv00052
Petitioner: Alexandra Guzman-Beato
Respondent: R. McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?