Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Diana R. Morales v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 5:2025cv00807
Plaintiff:
Diana R Morales
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
(PC) Morales v. Espitia et al
as 1:2025cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ernest R. Morales
Defendant:
Gustavo Espitia, Marco Rodriguez, Gabriel Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Hyungseop Shim v. R. Morales
as 2:2025cv00968
Petitioner:
Joseph Hyungseop Shim
Respondent:
R. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Travers v. Macomber et al
as 1:2025cv00033
Defendant:
A. Hernandez, J. Macomber, R. Morales and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Travers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Williams v. Morales
as 2:2024cv02306
Petitioner:
Henry Don Williams
Respondent:
R. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PC) Green v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Jarvon D. Green
Defendant:
B. Phillips and R Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Green v. Phillips et al
as 2:2023cv01763
Plaintiff:
Jarvon D. Green
Defendant:
B. Phillips and R Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Green v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jarvon D. Green
Defendant:
B. Phillips and R. Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales et al v. Piche et al
as 3:2022cv07017
Plaintiff:
Vance L. Morales, Alan D. Morales and Frank R. Morales
Defendant:
Jorge Piche and Adriana Piche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
