Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Phillips v. Navarro et al
as 1:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Dezzan Denzell Phillips
Defendant:
Joseph R Navarro, Nicholas Navarroli, Cynitha M Raccuglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery et al v. Kent County et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kellie Sinke, Deborah J. Parker, Peter Avery and others
Defendant:
Kent County, Peter MacGregor, Kenneth D. Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Navarro v. FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.
as 1:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R. Navarro
Defendant:
FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cummings v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05914
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Michael Pettis, Stacy Toms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv03488
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Francisco R. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
DONNA J BELL, LAURYN E LITTLE, RACHEL I PAEZ and others
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC., UNLAUB / CHANNEL BEARING & SUPPLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thieme v. Sass et al
as 1:2021cv01225
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thieme
Defendant:
Michael Sass, Joseph R Navarro and Cynthia Raccuglia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulette R. Navarro v. Andrew Saul
as 3:2020cv04950
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Paulette R Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Xiong v. Navarro
as 0:2019cv01041
Defendant:
Brett R Navarro
Plaintiff:
Soua Xiong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
