Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Parker v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Laster v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Paulette Laster
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Brandon A Gatson and Timeka R Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robert Parker, Jr. v. John Barlow, et al
as 23-35425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT R. PARKER, Jr. and ROBERT ROOSEVELT PARKER, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN L. BARLOW, In his individual and representative capacity, PAULA A. BARRAN, In her individual and representative capacity, JOHN D. BURNS, In his individual and representative capacity and others
PARKER CHAILLA v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 5:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE R PARKER CHAILLA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Julian Williams
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Cody R. Parker, Cody Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
