Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kenneth Kerrivan v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-13045
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant: KENNETH KERRIVAN
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee: PHILLIP MORRIS USA, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company
: SERVICE
Mary Sowers v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
as 18-11902
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARY SOWERS, as personal representative of the Estate of Charles Sowers
Defendant - Appellee: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company
Mary Sowers v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-11901
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant: MARY SOWERS, as personal representative of the Estate of Charles Sowers
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company
Defendant - Appellant: PHILLIP MORRIS USA, INC., LIGGETT GROUP, LLC, formerly known as Liggett Group, Inc., DORSAL TOBACCO CORP. and others
Ellen Gray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
as 17-15446
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELLEN GRAY, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF HENRY GRAY
Defendant - Appellee: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company,
Ellen Gray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
as 17-15210
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant: ELLEN GRAY, as personal representative of the Estate OF HENRY GRAY
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company
: SERVICE
William Hecht v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-10447
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM HECHT
Defendant - Appellee: PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
Defendant: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and the American Tobacco Company, LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY and LIGGETT GROUP, LLC, f.k.a. Liggett Group, Inc.
Pauline Burkhart v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-14708
Plaintiff - Appellee: PAULINE BURKHART
Defendant - Appellant: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and the American Tobacco Company, PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Judy Brown, et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al
as 14-13090
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUDY BROWN, as personal representative of the Estate of Freddie L. Brown, BETH GRIFFIN, CAROL TYLICZKA, as personal representative of the Estate of Millard Harris and others
Defendant - Appellee: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and the American Tobacco Company, PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Lawrence Chamberlain v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al
as 14-12889
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE CHAMBERLAIN
Defendant - Appellee: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and the American Tobacco Company and LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Cheryl Searcy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15258
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHERYL SEARCY
Defendant - Appellant: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company and PHILLIP MORRIS USA, INC.
: SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?