Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
R.R. Street & Co., Inc. et al v. Tex-Ray Industrial Co. Ltd.
as 1:2019cv02251
Defendant: Taiwan Supercritical Technologies, Ltd. and Tex-Ray Industrial Co. Ltd.
Plaintiff: R.R. Street & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R.R. Street & Co., Inc. v. Maxwell
as 1:2013cv08581
Plaintiff: R.R. Street & Co., Inc.
Defendant: Sharon W. Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Team Enterprises, LLC v. Western Investment Real Estate, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-16916
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEAM ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant: WESTERN INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE TRUST, AKA Western Properties Trust and WPT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: PK II CENTURY CENTER LP, PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC., as a corporation and as successor-in-interest to Western Investment Real Estate Trust, KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION, as a corporation and as successor-in-interest to Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and others
Third-party-defendant: CITY OF MODESTO
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, et al
as 10-15951
Plaintiff - Appellant: HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERT ANGIOLI, BURNELL ANGIOLI, MULTIMATIC CORPORATION and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee: TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant: CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Suffolk County Water Authority v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 2:2010cv01803
Defendant: American Laundry Machinery, Inc., Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Bergparma of America, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Suffolk County Water Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 10-15605
Plaintiff - Appellee: HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant: ALBERT ANGIOLI, BURNELL ANGIOLI, MULTIMATIC CORPORATION and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant: TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant - Appellee: CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant: HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant: ALBERT ANGIOLI and BURNELL ANGIOLI
Defendant - Appellee: MULTIMATIC CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC LLC and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee: TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant: CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Transport Insurance Company v. R.R. Street & Co. Inc., et al
as 10-55404
Plaintiff - Appellee: TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: R.R. STREET & CO. INC. and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, individually and as subrogee of R.R. Street & Co. Inc.
Type: Contract Insurance
R.R. Street & Co. Inc., et al v. Transport Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-55361
Plaintiff - Appellant: R.R. STREET & CO. INC. and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, individually and as subrogee of R.R. Street & Co. Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
Type: Contract Insurance
R.R. Street & Co. Inc. et al v. Transport Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv06045
Plaintiff: R.R. Street & Co. Inc., National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A., National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. and others
Defendant: Transport Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?