Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature, et al
as 15-3227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, ZACHARY WILSON, MATHEW COOK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC, PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC, KUM&GO, L.C. and others
Defendant Third-Party Defendant:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC., CHEVRON USA, INC. and others
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature, et al
as 15-3221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, ZACHARY WILSON, MATHEW COOK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC, PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC, KUM&GO, L.C. and others
Defendant Third-Party Defendant:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC., CHEVRON USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carter v. Race Trac Petroleum, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02660
Plaintiff:
Melissa Carter
Defendant:
Race Trac Petroleum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature, et al
as 10-3101
Petitioner:
SOCIETY OF INDEPENDENT GASOLINE MARKETERS OF AMERICA, PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC, QUICKTRIP CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
3 GIRLS ENTERPRISES, INC., SAMANTHA BAYLARD, KENNETH BECKER and others
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
AMPRIDE, INC., BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC. and others
Intervenor:
NATSO, INC.
Movant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
