Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Ramos, et al v. Garland
as 24-9524
Petitioner: MODESTA RAMOS RAMOS, A.M.R.R. and J.A.R.R.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Viegas et al v. Partner Colorado Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff: Keri Lynn Viegas, Keri L. Viegas and James Viegas
Defendant: Partner Colorado Credit Union, Harry L. Simon, Danielle L Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ramos v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00729
Counter Defendant: Valeria Ramos
Counter Claimant: GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01933
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ramos, et al v. Garland
as 23-9567
Petitioner: MODESTA RAMOS RAMOS, A.M.R.R. and J.A.R.R.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Ramos et al
as 1:2023cv01644
Plaintiff: Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant: John Ramos, Martine Leslie and Steven Leslie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Ramos
as 23-6071
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ISAAC MANUEL RAMOS
Dominguez-Ramos v. Garland
as 23-9519
Petitioner: ELPIDIO DOMINGUEZ-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?