Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03519
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 21-50241
Petitioner / Appellant:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 1:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00182
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Lawson, et al v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 20-10099
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN, Custodian of Offender Records, JAMES P. ANDERS, Assistant Warden at the James V. Allred Unit, MAILROOM SYSTEM COORDINATOR'S PANEL, Director, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Appellant:
RANDALL SCOTT JORDAN
Randall Jordan v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-51128
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL SCOTT JORDAN
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jordan v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2019cv00101
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Lawson v. William Stephens, et al
as 19-10398
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN, Custodian of Offender Records, JAMES P. ANDERS, Assistant Warden at the James V. Allred Unit, MAILROOM SYSTEM COORDINATOR'S PANEL, Director, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Appellant:
RANDALL SCOTT JORDAN
Randall Jordan v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50032
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDALL SCOTT JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
