Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Miller v. 21st Judicial District Court
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller
Defendant:
21st Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15405
Plaintiff:
RANDY MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jerome Kobishop v. Randy Miller
as 22-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME W. KOBISHOP
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY MILLER
Kobishop v. Miller
as 1:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jerome W Kobishop
Defendant:
Randy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrance Shaw v. Paul Kemper, et al
as 22-1707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL S. KEMPER, Warden, JACK F. CHIOVATERO, RANDY MILLER and others
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64543
Plaintiff:
RANDY MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randi Miller et al v. AIG Property Casualty Company
as 2:2021cv07848
Plaintiff:
Randi Miller and Terence Cunningham
Defendant:
AIG Property Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52849
Plaintiff:
RANDY MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicole Cavicante et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv06676
Plaintiff:
NICOLE CAVICANTE, individually and as Successor in Interest to RANDY MILLER, deceased, JEREMY CAVICANTE, individually and as Successor in Interest to RANDY MILLER, deceased, Nicole Cavicante and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, OFFICER DANIEL NUNEZ, OFFICER ANTONIO VALASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
