Cases 91 - 100 of 814
Saffold v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv03301
Plaintiff:
Robert Saffold
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, Daniel Artl, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuhaiber v. IDOC et al
as 1:2018cv03290
Plaintiff:
Fadeel Shuhaiber
Defendant:
IDOC, Randy Pfister, Charles Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01178
Plaintiff:
Ian Lockhart
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Michael Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jovan Battle v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 18-1980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY PFISTER, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Jovan Battle v. Bruce Faulkner, et al
as 18-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE FAULKNER, The supervisor of field services for NRC, RANDY PFISTER, The Head Warden, JOHN DOE, The field service employee #1 and others
Ames v. Dr. Obaisi et al
as 1:2018cv02930
Plaintiff:
Thomas Russel Ames
Defendant:
Dr. Obaisi, C/O Medein, Jill Hosselton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv02899
Plaintiff:
Melvin Jordan
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Donald Stolworthy, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunner v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02901
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Brunner
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc., Estate of Dr. Saleh Obaisi, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jovan Battle v. State of Illinois, et al
as 18-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, JOHN DOE, Sgt.(3-11 shift), RANDY PFISTER and others
Jovan Battle v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 18-1820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATEVILLE NRC MENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, RANDY PFISTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
