Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Porter v. McJunkins et al
as 4:2023cv04085
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Porter
Defendant:
Sheriff Brian McJunkins, Louis Boeling and Chief Deputy Joey Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ray Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PORTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38468
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY RAY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24732
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. WALDO COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Respondent:
RAY PORTER, CAPTAIN WALKER and WALDO COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
BRADLEY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PORTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23392
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX RAY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porter v. Huffman et al
as 4:2017cv00484
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ray Porter
Defendant:
Scott Huffman, Faulkner County Detention Facility and Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Porter v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-50245
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD RAY PORTER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Porter v. Thaler
as 5:2011cv00356
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Gerald Ray Porter
Respondent:
Rick C. Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Thaler
as 5:2011cv00322
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Gerald Ray Porter
Respondent:
Director Rick C. Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
