Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Re/Max, LLC v. Macahon et al
as 1:2013cv01360
Plaintiff:
Re/Max, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Macahon, Tamera Macahon and Property Advisors, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. TMT Development Co., Inc.
as 3:2012cv02181
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
TMT Development Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd et al
as 4:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd and Matthew L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd et al
as 5:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd and Matthew L. Jones
Counter_claimant:
Matthew L. Jones and M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd
Counter_defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. McCroskey et al
as 1:2012cv03290
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Melita McCroskey, Karen Chandler and McCroskey & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. Southside Realty, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Southside Realty, Inc., Peter Janson and Daniel Lewis Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RE/MAX, LLC v. Aberman et al
as 6:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Jack Aberman and GEA Seaside Investment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RE/MAX, LLC v. Shelor et al
as 4:2011cv00223
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Alan Shelor and Alan Shelor Real Estate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/MAX, LLC v. Zanecchia et al
as 1:2011cv12168
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Paul Zanecchia and ZMAX Realty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Re/Max LLC v. Ly et al
as 3:2011cv02126
Defendant:
Leon Ly, Inc and Leon Ly
Plaintiff:
Re/Max LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
