Cases 31 - 40 of 56
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMEN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETT v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2015cv01383
Plaintiff:
JEVON A. EVERETT
Defendant:
PIERCE, BRIAN COLEMAN, ASHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DiPietro v. The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nicodemo DiPietro
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein, Daniel Mienert, John T. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCAIN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CERSARINO-MARTIN, MAJOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RIECO v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE RIECO
Defendant:
BRIAN COLEMAN, SAVAADRE, GALLUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IACOVETTI v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01788
Plaintiff:
HENRY J. IACOVETTI
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DANIEL BURNS, OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATION AND INTELLIGENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITNEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv01623
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITNEY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. CRAYTON et al
as 2:2012cv01533
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F JENKINS
Defendant:
CRAYTON, ROLL, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Crayton et al
as 3:2012cv02006
Plaintiff:
Edward F Jenkins
Defendant:
Crayton, Roll, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
BRIAN E. COLEMAN, GARTH WALLS, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
