Cases 41 - 50 of 61
WHITNEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv01623
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITNEY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. CRAYTON et al
as 2:2012cv01533
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F JENKINS
Defendant:
CRAYTON, ROLL, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Crayton et al
as 3:2012cv02006
Plaintiff:
Edward F Jenkins
Defendant:
Crayton, Roll, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
BRIAN E. COLEMAN, GARTH WALLS, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McCain v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv00789
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Keri Moore, James C. Barnacle and others
Plaintiff:
John McCain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. ZIRKLE et al
as 2:2011cv00893
Plaintiff:
CARL LANE
Defendant:
RICHELLE L. ZIRKLE, RHONDA HOUSE and C/O WORSTELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITNEY v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2010cv01705
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITNEY
Defendant:
R. BARKLEY, SAMUEL J. RYMAROWICZ, MARRY ANN LOCKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Jones v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-4477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON T. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Superintendent, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, EDWARD BOHNA, School Principal and others
Aaron Jones v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-3985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON T. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Superintendent, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, EDWARD BOHNA, School Principal and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
