Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Lopez v. Office of the Secretary of State et al
as 5:2017cv02886
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Defendant:
Office of the Secretary of State and Unknown State of California Government Personnel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ricardo Calderon-Lopez v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-15240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ, AKA Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security
Ricardo Calderon-Lopez v. Carolyn Colvin
as 16-17353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ, AKA Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. Tigran Gumushyan et al
as 4:2016cv07236
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Defendant:
Tigran Gumushyan, Darryl Onizuka and Doe Vazquez
Respondent:
United States of America
Movant:
Defendant Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv02732
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. Sally C. Reason
as 2:2015cv08850
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Defendant:
Sally C. Reason
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez et al v. Tigran Gumushyan et al
as 2:2015cv02389
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez and Starlight Entertainment Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Tigran Gumushyan, Darryl Onizuka, Sunset Housing Solutions LP and others
Ricardo J. Calderon Lopez v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2014cv00724
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Ricardo Lopez v. USA
as 11-55834
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. United States
as 2:2011cv02929
Petitioner:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Respondent:
United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
