Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 21-5156
Plaintiff / Appellant: Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: State of North Carolina, NC Administrative Officers of the Courts, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
HANKINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01066
Defendant: WAKE COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION SERVICE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS, WEST COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Davis, Jr. v. Andrew Taylor, Jr., et al
as 13-14360
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD JEFFERSON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW THOMAS TAYLOR, JR., NAOMI ALAZRAKI TAYLOR, LOUIS RICHARD COHAN and others
Davis v. Taylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00986
Plaintiff: Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr
Defendant: Andrew Thomas Taylor, Jr , Naomi Alazraki Taylor , Louis Richard Cohan and others
Davis v. Taylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02970
Plaintiff: Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr
Defendant: Andrew Thomas Taylor, Jr, Naomi Alazraki Taylor, Louis Richard Cohan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanover v. King County Housing Authority et al
as 2:2008cv00269
Plaintiff: Harrison Hanover
Defendant: King County Housing Authority, Prometheus Management, Richard Cohan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COHAN v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00241
Plaintiff: RICHARD COHAN
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION and WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?