Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Sabrina v. Fairbank
as 3:2023cv02798
Plaintiff:
Archibald Sabrina
Defendant:
Richard D. Fairbank and Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
JABRI et al v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
TARIQ JABRI and FALON CHARLES-JABRI
Defendant:
MARILYN GONZALEZ and RICHARD D. FAIRBANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
JABRI et al v. GONZALEZ
as 2:2022cv07448
Plaintiff:
TARIQ JABRI and FALON CHARLES-JABRI
Defendant:
MARILYN GONZALEZ, BRANCH MANAGER FOR CAPITAL ONE BANK and RICHARD D. FAIRBANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Ivan Davis
as 22-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN D. DAVIS, Magistrate Judge, RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, President CEO Headquarters and DEENA L. REYNOLDS, In-House Landlord Tenant Counsel
Brown v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
Ivan D. Davis, Richard D. Fairbank and Deena L. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FAIRBANK
as 1:2021cv02325
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICHARD D. FAIRBANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Dixon v. Capital One Bank
as 21-30292
Defendant / Appellee:
Capital One Bank, Richard D. Fairbank, Matthew C. Trout and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Landry Dixon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
