Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ervin v. Fry et al
as 2:2019cv03740
Defendant:
Correctional Officer McCoy, Lt Fry, Correctional Officer Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Crisler
as 2:2019cv02986
Defendant:
Matthew Crisler
Plaintiff:
Richard Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Crisler
as 1:2019cv00547
Defendant:
Matthew Crisler
Plaintiff:
Richard Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW, Audrey J. Baltoff, Frances Mae Musgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Randall Rolle v. City of Tallahassee, Florida, et al
as 15-14382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, NICOLE RAYSOR, Probation Officer, Department of Corrections, BRIAN ENGLES, Supervisor, Department of Corrections and others
Rolle v. City of Tallahassee et al
as 5:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
City of Tallahassee, Florida, Nicole Raysor, Brian Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. Raysor et al
as 5:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Nicole Raysor, Brian Engles, M Lilja Dardelake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. Raysor et al
as 5:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Nicole Raysor, Brian Engles, Lilja M. Dandelake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROLLE v. ENGLES et al.
as 4:2014cv00342
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
BRIAN ENGLES, NICOLE RAYSOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERVIN et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv02170
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ERVIN and ANNIE ERVIN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
