Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Shupe v. Pima County Adult Detention Center, et al.
as 23-3600
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARL RICHARD SHUPE
Respondent / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER and MARK FEIS, Adult Probation Officer
Shupe v. 7-Eleven Incorporated et al
as 4:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
E Richard Shupe
Defendant:
7-Eleven Incorporated, Speedway #2978, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Shupe v. Feis
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
E Richard Shupe
Defendant:
Mark Feis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shupe v. Pima County Adult Probation Department et al
as 4:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
Earl Richard Shupe
Respondent:
Pima County Adult Probation Department and Mark Feis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shupe v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
E Richard Shupe
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shupe v. Faust
as 4:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Terri Faust
Plaintiff:
E Richard Shupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shupe v. Roberts et al
as 4:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Kent Batty, Vince Roberts and Matthew Ashton
Plaintiff:
E Richard Shupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shupe et al v. Lewis & Lewis Insurance Agency Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00159
Plaintiff:
Richard Shupe and Maria Shupe
Defendant:
Lewis & Lewis Insurance Agency Incorporated and Qualitas Compania de Seguros SA Grupo AUSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shupe et al v. Kroger Company et al
as 4:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Richard Shupe and Maria Shupe
Defendant:
Kroger Company , Reye Rochoa and Linda Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Shupe v. GSA
as 17-16064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SHUPE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
