Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KEENE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEENE
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH LEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. FEDERAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORPORATION, JAMES E FINCH, SCOTT A RAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CALL, JR v. CURTIS et al
as 1:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
REX CALL, JR
Defendant:
CHAD CURTIS and RICK LOLBIRDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. LANDIS et al
as 2:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
RICK A SAVAGE
Defendant:
BRIAN T LANDIS , MATTHEW NOYES , WAYNE GALLANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. PERRY et al
as 2:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
PATRICK A WHITE, SR
Defendant:
RICK PERRY, STATE OF TEXAS, DAVID DEWHURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHAM v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
GLEN A WITHAM
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE , ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , GUY DESJARDINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARENT v. U S CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION et al
as 1:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
SANDRA PARENT
Defendant:
U S CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION, STATE OF MAINE, ROBERT FLYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
FRASCA et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
HEIDI FRASCA and JOHN FRASCA
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, JOHN BALDACCI, G STEVEN ROWE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FRASCA et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
HEIDI FRASCA
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, JOHN BALDACCI, G STEVEN ROWE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
