Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ZEB v. RIVERSIDE PEDIATRIC GROUP, P.C.
as 2:2023cv02756
Plaintiff:
ANNIE ZEB
Defendant:
RIVERSIDE PEDIATRIC GROUP, P.C. doing business as PROHEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY doing business as RIVERSIDE MEDICAL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Powell v. Riverside Physician Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
John S. Powell, Jr.
Defendant:
Riverside Physician Services, Inc. doing business as Riverside Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
SALERNO MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, LLP et al v. RIVERSIDE MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv10539
Defendant:
OPTUM CARE, INC., OPTUM, INC., UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
SENIOR HEALTHCARE OUTREACH PROGRAM, INC., SM MEDICAL LLC, SALERNO MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carroll v. Donohue et al
as 4:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Dr. John H Donohue, Riverside Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Riverside Regional Medical Center, Riverside Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Riverside Surgical Specialists and others
Plaintiff:
Debra K Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PASCALE v. RIVERSIDE MEDICAL GROUP et al
as 3:2019cv18586
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY JAIL'S MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, BRICK HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE MEDICAL GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
JASON PASCALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALERNO, M.D. et al v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv18130
Plaintiff:
AMANDA MARINO, M.D., ALEXANDER SALERNO, M.D., DIANA LARREA, D.O. and others
Defendant:
AMERICHOICE OF NEW JERSEY, INC., AMERICHOICE, INC., UNITEDHEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
