Cases 1 - 10 of 48
RED STICK ACQUISITIONS LLC v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2021cv00276
Plaintiff:
RED STICK ACQUISITIONS LLC
Defendant:
DOUGLAS M DONAHUE, DALE SIMONDS, DAVID SIMONDS and others
Interested Party:
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Haines et al
as 5:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jennifer S. Haines and Riverwalk Holdings, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Boyce et al
as 1:2016cv02404
Defendant:
Paul Boyce, New York City Environmental Control Board, New York City Parking Violations Bureau and others
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Andersen v. Riverwalk Holdings LTD
as 2:2015cv00621
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings LTD and John Does
Plaintiff:
Dean Andersen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Farmer v. Riverwalk Holdings Ltd
as 4:2015mc00011
Plaintiff:
Carmen Farmer
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings Ltd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv02105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roman Batista v. Riverwalk Holding Ltd et al
as 1:2015cv10461
Plaintiff:
Omyra Roman Batista
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holding Ltd, De Ville Asset Management Ltd and Jay Brian Ledford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
