Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Shapiro v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Robert Shapiro
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shapiro v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Robert Shapiro
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haas v. Rabushka et al
as 4:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Aviel Haas
Defendant:
Aileen RABUSHKA, Rabushka Investment, RITA SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2615 Contracts
USA v. Robert Shapiro
as 23-12660
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT SHAPIRO
SHAPIRO v. BARBER et al
as 3:2022cv05396
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHAPIRO
Defendant:
DONNA BARBER, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS and DAWN SCHILLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHAPIRO et al v. WHEATON WORLD WIDE MOVING, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv11609
Defendant:
SOPKO MOVERS, INC. and WHEATON WORLD WIDE MOVING, INC.
Plaintiff:
BETH SHAPIRO and ROBERT SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallo v. Protective Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03494
Defendant:
Loriann V. Lowery-Biggers, John D Nichols, Jr, Nathan Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gallo
Jacob L Halberstam Profit Sharing Plan v. Protective Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03143
Plaintiff:
Jacob L Halberstam Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant:
Loriann V. Lowery-Biggers, Nathan Shapiro, David W. Michelson and others
Rothberg v. Protective Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03147
Defendant:
Loriann V. Lowery-Biggers, Nathan Shapiro, David W. Michelson and others
Plaintiff:
Brynn Rothberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Waterman v. Protective Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02776
Defendant:
Loriann V. Lowery-Biggers, Nathan Shapiro, David W. Michelson and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
