Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Annabel, II v. Fronczak, et al
as 2:2023cv11123
Plaintiff:
Robert Annabel II
Defendant:
N. Fronczak, Kristopher Steece, Willis Chapman and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Jackson County, MI Sheriff Department, et al
as 22-2071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY, MI SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ADVANCED HEALTH CARE, GARY SCHUTTE, Sheriff and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Joseph Novak, et al
as 22-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH NOVAK, Law Librarian, KEVIN WOODS, Captain and JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Deputy Warden
Annabel, II v. Jackson County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2022cv12189
Plaintiff:
Robert Annabel, II
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Department, Advanced Health Care, Gary Schutte and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Jorg Erichsen, et al
as 17-1542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
JORG ERICHSEN, BROWN, Warden, Corrections Officer, ANTWAN ODEN, Corrections Officer and others
Defendant:
[UNKNOWN] ROBBINSON, Corrections Officer
Robert Annabel, II v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 16-2398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, CHRISTOPHER KING, AARON RUTGERS and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, PAUL KLEE, LEE MCROBERTS and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Ericson, et al
as 15-1861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
ERICSON, Corrections Officer, et al
Robert Annabel v. Jack Frost, et al
as 15-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK FROST, STEVEN KINDINGER, SHERMAN CAMPBELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
