Cases
Haynes, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3327
Plaintiff: CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS and others
Not Yet Classified: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES, ATTORNEY, counsel for plaintiff
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv04821
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Investigator Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01058
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gregory Haynes, et al v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 23-15162
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES
Plaintiff: CHERYL JOY COTTERILL
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL and others
Gregory Haynes v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 13-17258
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ANDREW BRAUN, MATHEW MASON and others
Gregory Haynes v. City of San Francisco, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-16327
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW BRAUN, ESTER CHOO, ROBERT DYNES and others
Cheryl Cotterill v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 09-17647
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant - Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL and others
Bean et al v. PUC Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00158
Plaintiff: David Bean, Susan Bean, Janice Bailey and others
Defendant: PUC Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?