Cases 31 - 40 of 51
THOMAS v. MOATS, CO. I et al
as 2:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
MOATS, CO. I, A. SCHAMP, JOHN DOE (S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYO v. FINLEY et al
as 2:2016cv01514
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAYO
Defendant:
FINLEY, LEWIS, GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAWLS v. GIBBS et al
as 2:2016cv01438
Plaintiff:
SAMEECH RAWLS
Defendant:
GIBBS, MICHAEL GUYTON, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv01318
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
ROBERT D. GILMORE , ZAKEN , W. LEGGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOZER v. RIGGENBACH et al
as 2:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Defendant:
ANGELA RIGGENBACH, L.S. KERNS-BARR, MARK DIALESANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DALIE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00698
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DALIE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, DIANA WOODSIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DALIE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DALIE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, DIANA WOODSIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREELEY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv00089
Petitioner:
ALBERT T. GREELEY, III
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSER v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv01516
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN MOSER
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, IRMA VIHLIDAL, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv05659
Petitioner:
BASIL BROOKS
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
