Cases 1 - 10 of 67
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21973
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIXON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dixon v. Long
as 1:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Robert Dixon
Respondent:
Jeffey Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIXON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, MICHAEL J. LEWIS, VIGO COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dixon v. Long
as 1:2022cv02061
Petitioner:
Robert Dixon
Respondent:
Jeffey Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. BLINKEN
as 1:2022cv02357
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIXON
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
DIXON v. HIGHLAND DALLAS FREIGHT INC et al
as 5:2021cv00204
Defendant:
UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO, EPHREM AWEKE BECHA and HIGHLAND DALLAS FREIGHT INC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON et al v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv11163
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA DIXON and ROBERT DIXON
Defendant:
PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, JOHN DOE and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. THE RECORD INC.
as 1:2021cv20940
Defendant:
THE RECORD INC. and The Madison County Record, Inc. d/b/a Florida Record
Plaintiff:
Robert Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
