Cases
Cases 1 - 3 of 3
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Cambridge University Press, et al v. J. Albert, et al
as 16-15726
Defendant / Appellee: J. L. ALBERT, in his official capacity as Georgia State University Associate Provost for Information Systems and Technology, JAMES R. JOLLY, in his official capacity as member of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, W. MANSFIELD JENNINGS, JR., in his official capacity as member of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC., SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. and CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES, AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, THE AUTHORS GUILD and others
Cambridge University Press, et al v. J. Albert, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-15726
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC. and SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: J. L. ALBERT, in his official capacity as Georgia State University Associate Provost for Information Systems and Technology, KENNETH R. BERNARD, JR., in his official capacity as member of the Board of regents of the University System of Georga, ROBERT F. HATCHER, in his official capacity as Vice Chair of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia and others
Cambridge University Press, et al v. J.L. Albert, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-14676
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. and OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as President of Georgia State University, J. L. ALBERT, in his official capacity as Georgia State University Associate Provost for Information System and Technology, KENNETH R. BERNARD, JR., in his official capacity as member of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?