Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
In re: Demetrius Bailey
as 17-1614
Petitioner: In re: DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent: VINCENT MOONEY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: ROBERT V BARTH, JR.
Alton Brown v. Gary Lancaster, et al
as 17-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee: GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Debtor - Appellee: THOMAS J. RUETER
In re: Alton D. Brown, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2749
Petitioner: In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent: GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent: JAMES M. MUNLEY
BANKS v. CESSOR et al
as 2:2015mc00877
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON, GREGORY C. MELUCCI and others
Daniel Spuck v. Thomas Ridge, et al
as 15-2765
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: FORMER GOVERNOR THOMAS RIDGE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PAUL STOWITSKY, Superintendent, SRCF Mercer and others
In re: Alton Brown, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1616
Petitioner: In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent: GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent: JAMES M. MUNLEY
Brown v. Lancaster et al
as 3:2014cv01180
Plaintiff: Alton D. Brown
Defendant: Gary L. Lancaster, J. Curtis Joyner, Thomas J. Rueter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr.
as 14-1564
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: ROBERT V BARTH, JR.
Daniel Spuck v. Thomas Ridge, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4292
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS RIDGE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PAUL STOWITSKY, Superintenedent, SRCF Mercer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1674
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?