Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Towle v. Edmark
as 19-2015
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT V. TOWLE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, NH State Prison
Towle v. Zenk
as 17-1251
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT V. TOWLE
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden, NH State Prison
Towle v. Zenk
as 16-2224
Petitioner:
ROBERT V. TOWLE
Respondent:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden, NH State Prison
Towle v. Zenk
as 16-2175
Petitioner:
ROBERT V. TOWLE
Respondent:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, NH State Prison, Warden
Towle v. NH State Prison, Warden
as 1:2015cv00117
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
NH State Prison, Warden
Petitioner:
Robert V. Towle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Towle v. Hartshorn
as 1:2013fp00485
Defendant:
Michelle Hartshorn
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Towle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towle v. Bornstein et al
as 1:2013fp00106
Defendant:
Peter H. Bornstein and Timothy J. Vaughan
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Towle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towle v. Coos County Superior Court
as 12-2036
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT V. TOWLE
Respondent - Appellee:
COOS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Towle v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2012fp00299
Defendant:
Peter H. Bornstein and Timothy J. Vaughn
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Towle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towle v. Coos County Superior Court
as 1:2012cv00254
Defendant:
Coos County Superior Court
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Towle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
