Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Steven Cody v. William Wiesenbach, Jr., et al
as 14-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven Donnelle Cody, also known as Stephen Cody-Hassan
Defendant - Appellee:
William Wiesenbach, Jr., Corporal, Grimes Unit, ADC, Bradley Howard Robertson, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC, William Davidson, Corporal, Grimes Unit, ADC and others
Bishmael Obamas v. William Wiesenbach, Jr., et al
as 14-2257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bishmael H. Obamas
Defendant - Appellee:
William Wiesenbach, Jr., Corporal, Arkansas Department of Correction, Grimes Unit, Bradley Howard Robertson, Sergeant, Arkansas Department of Correction, Grimes Unit, William Davidson, Corporal, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Al Fisher, Jr. v. Plainer, et al
as 12-17556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AL GENE FISHER, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
PLAINER, Lieutenant, ROBERTSON, Sergeant, SAVAGE, Correctional Officer and others
Kavin Rhodes v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-73843
:
In re: KAVIN M. RHODES
Petitioner:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
M. ROBINSON, R&R OFFICER, RON BLEVINS and others
Kavin Rhodes v. M. Robinson, et al
as 11-17161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROBINSON, RON BLEVINS, SARA MALONE and others
Kavin Rhodes v. M. Robinson, et al
as 11-15685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROBINSON, RON BLEVINS, SARA MALONE and others
Ronnie Barber v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 10-40495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE WAYNE BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CHUCK BISCOE, Senior Warden, ROBERT HERRERA, Assistant Warden and others
Kavin Rhodes v. M. Robinson, et al
as 08-16363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROBINSON, RON BLEVINS, SARA MALONE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
