Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lamar T. McKenstry v. William Bunn
as 25-6390
Plaintiff:
LAMAR MCKENSTRY, a/k/a Trequan L. McKenstry
Defendant:
WILLIAM BUNN, Lieutenant, ROBERT DEAN, Warden, O. SERIKI, Sergeant and others
Mills v. Lauren Beitzel et al
as 1:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren Beitzel, Vaughn Whiteman, Lieutenant, John G. Sindy, Case Management Specialist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Dicks v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
as 22-6148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution, JEFF NINES, Assistant Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution, LIEUTENANT JASON HARBAUGH, Captain, North Branch Correctional Institution and others
David Brightwell v. J. Morgan
as 20-7461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
AUDREY BROWN, Administrative Officer II, Inmate Grievance Office, SGT. ABIODUN ADAMOLEKUN, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION O. WAYNE HILL and others
Juan Carrero-Vasquez v. Bobby Shearin
as 14-6470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS CARRERO-VASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY D. SHEARIN, Warden, RANDY WATSON, Assistant Commissioner, ROBIN WOOLFORD, Deputy Director and others
Juan Carrero-Vasquez v. Duty Sargent
as 14-6255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS CARRERO-VASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DUTY SARGENT, SCHIEBEL, CO II, LINN, CO II and others
James Lomax v. Stephen Mack
as 13-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MESHACH LOMAX
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN MACK, Hearing Officer, SERGEANT WEDLOCK, Institutional Representative, BOBBY B. SHEARIN and others
Gregory Marshall v. Gary Maynard
as 12-7352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of D.O.C., JON P. GALLEY, Assistant Commissioner, D.O.C., J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, D.O.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
