Cases 31 - 40 of 29,333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
IN RE: JERRELL ROBINSON
as 2:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
JERRELL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Kimbler
as 6:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Michael Kimbler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Banks v. McGlynn, Hays & Co., Inc.
as 24-895
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS
Defendant:
MCGLYNN, HAYS & CO., INC., GERARD CARLUCCI, Individually, JOSEPH I. CRINCOLI, Individually and others
Nicholas FugediIn re: Nicholas Fugedi
as 24-40224
Petitioner:
In re: Nicholas Fugedi, in his capacity as trustee of the Carb Pura Vida Trust
Respondent:
Initram, Incorporated, RJL Realty, L.L.C., Eternal Investments, L.L.C. and others
USA v. Damien Robinson
as 24-11078
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAMIEN T. ROBINSON
C.H. Robinson Company v. United Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv02790
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Company, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Transportation Company, Inc.
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Company, Lancer Transport, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robinson v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01053
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James R. Robinson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Nathaniel S Robinson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. TRUMARK FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION
as 2:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
BREONIA SAPPHIRE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TRUMARK FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
