Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 23-8081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS VILSACK, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING
WILDERNESS WORKSHOP et al v. HARRELL et al
as 1:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
WILDERNESS WORKSHOP and ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD
Defendant:
Meryl Harrell, CHRIS FRENCH, Frank Beum and others
Intervenor Defendant:
BERLAIMONT ESTATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Dallas, et al
as 22-1438
Petitioner:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, SAN LUIS VALLEY ECOSYSTEM COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
DAN DALLAS, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, BRIAN FEREBEE, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, ANNE TIMBERMAN, in her official capacity as Western Colorado Supervisor and others
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Dallas, et al
as 22-1439
Petitioner:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, SAN LUIS VALLEY ECOSYSTEM COUNCIL, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE and others
Respondent:
DAN DALLAS, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor,, TAMARA WHITTINGTON, in her official capacity as Deputy Regional Forester, BRIAN FEREBEE, in his official capacity as Regional Forester and others
Intervenor:
LEAVELL-MCCOMBS JOINT VENTURE
WILDERNESS WORKSHOP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al.
as 1:2022cv03606
Plaintiff:
WILDERNESS WORKSHOP and ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and U.S. FOREST SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack and United States Forest Service
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-1426
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-1425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-1412
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, UTAH PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
