Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Anthony Blackwell v. Roderick Hickman
as 13-15285
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY M. BLACKWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN
Eric Knapp v. Arlitz, et al
as 11-17257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
ARLITZ, Prison Captain Guard, MATTHEW CATE, COLLINS, Prison Line Guard and others
Robert Feiger v. Roderick Hickman, et al
as 11-55585
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JEFFRY FEIGER
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General
Maurice Campbell v. CDCR, et al
as 10-17353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE C. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, RODERICK Q. HICKMAN and others
Airy v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
Charles D Airy
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Roderick Q. Hickman, John Dovey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2009cv05796
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker and Danny Troxell
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mathew Cate, Roderick Q. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Max v. Hernandez, et al
as 3:2004cv01189
Plaintiff:
Lindsay John Max
Defendant:
Steven Ritter , J B Hunt , C B Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khairy Aref v. Roderick Hickman, et al
as 09-56664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHAIRY AREF
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, JEANNIE S. WOODFORD, CHARLES MICHAEL HARRISON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
