Cases 1 - 10 of 74
JONES v. COMBS et al
as 1:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, JUSTIN DIOR COMBS, ETHIOPIA HABTEMARIAM and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01181
Petitioner:
Rodney Jones
Respondent:
Christopher Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Barnwell et al
as 6:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Ruth Barnwell, Christopher McClary, Q'asia Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Jarrett v. Does 1-25 et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tonee N. Jarrett
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-25, John Does 1-25 and Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones et al v. The Raymond Corporation
as 3:2022mc80074
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones and Deangela Battle
Intervenor:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Raymond Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
The Gap, Inc.
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42963
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RODNEY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Terryonto McGrier
as 21-4208
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRYONTO MCGRIER, a/k/a Rodney Jones
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
