Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shuler et al v. Arnott et al

as 6:2020cv03281
Plaintiff:
Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Jeremy Lynn, Joshua Davis, Greene County, MO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler v. Berryhill
as 6:2017cv03185
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Roger Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roger Shuler, et al v. Jessica Garrison, et al

as 17-11287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER SHULER and CAROL SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSICA MEDEIROS GARRISON, LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, individually and in his official capacity as Alabama attorney general, BILL BAXLEY and others
:
SERVICE
Roger Shuler, et al v. Liberty Duke, et al

as 16-15853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER SHULER and CAROL SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
LIBERTY DUKE, CHRISTINA CROW, JINKS CROW & DICKSON, law firm and others
Shuler et al v. Garrison et al

as 2:2016cv00695
Plaintiff:
Shuler, Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Garrison, Cliff Sims, Alabama Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler et al v. Duke et al

as 2:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Liberty Duke, Christina Crow, Jinks Crow & Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roger Shuler, et al v. William Swatek, et al

as 11-14861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER SHULER and CAROL SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM E. SWATEK, MIKE MCGARITY, ALABAMA STATE BAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 11-11264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roger Shuler, et al v. Ingram & Associates, et al

as 10-14509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER SHULER and CAROL SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
INGRAM & ASSOCIATES and NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.