Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Susan Chen, et al v. Natalie D'Amico, et al
as 20-35241
Plaintiff: J. L., a minor, NAIXIANG LIAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for L.L., a minor and L. L., a minor
Defendant: TIMOTHY EARWOOD, REDMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM SOULE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN CHEN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for J.L., a minor
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, KIMBERLY R. DANNER, in her individual capacity and official capacity as DSHS social worker, NATALIE D'AMICO, in her individual capacity and official capacity as a Redmond Police Department Officer and others
Naixiang Lian, et al v. Natlie D'Amico, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35118
Plaintiff: J. L., a minor, SUSAN CHEN and L. L., a minor
Defendant: TOM SOULE, JOHN DOES, A-D; E-H,, TIMOTHY EARWOOD and others
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, BILL MOSS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Washington State Acting Secretary, KIMBERLY R. DANNER, in her individual capacity and official capacity as DSHS social worker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAIXIANG LIAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for L.L., a minor
Susan Chen, et al v. Natalie D'Amico, et al
as 20-35119
Plaintiff: J. L., a minor, NAIXIANG LIAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for L.L., a minor and L. L., a minor
Defendant: TIMOTHY EARWOOD, REDMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM SOULE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN CHEN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for J.L., a minor
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, KIMBERLY R. DANNER, in her individual capacity and official capacity as DSHS social worker, NATALIE D'AMICO, in her individual capacity and official capacity as a Redmond Police Department Officer and others
GREEN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00081
Petitioner: JAMIE R. GREEN
Respondent: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RON GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENNETT v. NOBLE et al
as 3:2016cv00080
Plaintiff: CORDON X BENNETT
Defendant: CHAPMAN, RON GIBSON, HOLLOWAY and others
Miscellaneou: WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ron Gibson, et al v. PNC Bank, National Association, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35380
Plaintiff - Appellant: RON GIBSON, LORI A. GIBSON, FKA Lori A. Reed and SHON L. GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor-In-Interest by acquisition and merger of First Franklin, a Division of National City Bank of Indiana, UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC., U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Holders of First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-FF7 and others
SMITH v. LEMMON et al
as 3:2014cv00058
Respondent: RON GIBSON, BRUCE LEMMON and GIL PETERS
Petitioner: CLINT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craig et al v. Provo City et al
as 2:2014cv00091
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Craig and Nu Lite Sales
Defendant: Provo City, Ron Gibson, Lisa Killpack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson et al v. PNC Bank, National Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01819
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., PNC Bank, National Association, ReconTrust Company, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Lori A. Gibson, Ron Gibson and Shon L. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jefferson Mining District et al v. Kitzhaber et al
as 1:2013cv01147
Plaintiff: Hal Anthony, Ron Gibson and Jefferson Mining District
Defendant: Senator Alan Bates, Peter Courtney, Democratic Party of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?