Cases 1 - 10 of 310
TAYLOR et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2025cv01161
Plaintiff:
REJON TAYLOR, NORRIS HOLDER, BRANDON BASHAM and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PAMELA J. BONDI, EMIL BOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LUZIER v. RUNYON et al
as 5:2025cv00037
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOEY LUZIER, III
Defendant:
SERGEANT JOHN R RUNYON and OFFICER SARAH K SHIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: David Runyon
as 25-1132
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID DEARIES RUNYON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jasso et al v. Abels et al
as 6:2025cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jody Wilson Jasso, Maximus Misha Jasso and Serenity Ann Chapman
Defendant:
Teela Marie Abels, Dustin K Edward Abels, Daryl Eugene Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DAVIS v. GRUBE et al
as 5:2024cv00411
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY WILLIAM M KENDALL, LIETENANT BRIAN BLANTON, JUDGE JEFFREY L GRUBE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHAWN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan, Ronald v. Runyon, James et al
as 3:2024cv00797
Defendant:
James T. Runyon and Tracy Wood
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sutter & Gillham PLLC et al v. Runyon et al
as 4:2024cv00911
Defendant:
Emily Runyon, Mel Sayes, Matthews Sanders & Sayes PA and others
Plaintiff:
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, Lucien Gillham and Luther Sutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Runyon v. FCA US, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Patrick Runyon
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Runyon v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv02681
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Glenn Runyon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
