Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Taylor v. Bobby et al
as 1:2024cv01938
Defendant:
Andrew Bobby, David Reisdorf, Ryan Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Ross et al
as 8:2024cv01914
Defendant:
Director Foster, Corporal Hancock, Director Ryan Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Horace Linton Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Defendant:
ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELISABETH FISHER WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ross v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
James Ryan Ross
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross et al v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina
as 4:2023cv03422
Plaintiff:
Stacy Ross and Ryan Ross
Defendant:
Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McKendry-Verhunce v. Wozniak et al
as 3:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ross McKendry-Verhunce
Defendant:
Steve Wozniak and Nick Griebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council et al v. Wal-Tek, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04171
Plaintiff:
Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council and Ryan Ross
Defendant:
Wal-Tek, Inc. and Carl Barone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
