Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Roe v. Doe
as 1:2025cv02102
Plaintiff:
Rachel Roe
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Civil Action Relating to Disclosure of Intimate Images
Roe et al v. Rutherford County Board of Education et al
as 3:2025cv00429
Plaintiff:
Rachel Roe, David Doe, Claire Coe and others
Defendant:
Rutherford County Board of Education and James Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PFLAG, Inc. v. Donald Trump
as 25-1279
Plaintiff:
PFLAG, INC., AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, INC., d/b/a GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality, GABE GOE, by and through his parent and next friend George Goe and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DOROTHY FINK, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and others
PFLAG, Inc. et al v. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States et al
as 1:2025cv00337
Plaintiff:
PFLAG, Inc., American Association of Physicians for Human Rights, Inc. d/b/a GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality, Gabe Goe, by and through his parent and next friend George Goe and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dorothy A. Fink, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
PFLAG, Inc. et al v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 8:2025cv00337
Plaintiff:
PFLAG, Inc., American Association of Physicians for Human Rights, Inc. doing business as GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality, Gabe Goe and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dorothy A. Fink and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MARYLAND, American Academy of Pediatrics et al., Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
McGregor v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv06951
Defendant:
Danielle Deane Harewood, Romel Reuben, Richard/Rachel Roes # 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Shashala McGregor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv21934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe, et al. v. Critchfield, et al.
as 23-2807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA ROE, by and through her parents and next friends, RYAN ROE, RACHEL ROE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her official capacity as Idaho State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LINDA CLARK, in their official capacities as members of the Idaho State Board of Education, WILLIAM G. GILBERT, JR., in their official capacities as members of the Idaho State Board of Education and others
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff:
DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Roe, et al. v. Critchfield, et al.
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
RR, a minor, Ryan Roe, Rachel Roe and others
Defendant:
Debbie Critchfield, Idaho State Board of Education, Linda Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
