Cases
Shaw et al v. Oak City Protection, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00396
Plaintiff: RACHELLE SHAW and MARKELL HAREWOOD
Defendant: OAK CITY PROTECTION, LLC, ALPHA DEFENSE GROUP CORP., AUSTIN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Shaw et al v. Ferrugio Design, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00309
Plaintiff: Todd Shaw and Rachelle Shaw
Defendant: Ferrugio Design Inc. doing business as Ferrugio Design + Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01368
Defendant: Todd Shaw, Rachelle Shaw, Ferrugio Design, Inc. a California Business dba Ferrugio Design + Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02618
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monjaras and Wismeyer Group, Inc. v. Rachel Shaw We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv06171
Plaintiff: Monjaras & Wismeyer Group, Inc. and Monjaras and Wismeyer Group, Inc.
Defendant: Rachel Shaw, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Shaw HR Consulting, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rachel Shaw v. City of Dayton, et al
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellant: RACHEL SHAW, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the Deceased, Kylen English
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF DAYTON, OFFICER ALEX MAGILL and JOHN/JANE DOE, Supervisor(s)
Shaw v. City of Dayton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00210
Plaintiff: Rachel Shaw
Defendant: City of Dayton , Alex Magill and John and/or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00284
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?