Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Jimenez v. The State of Texas
as 5:2013cv00151
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Joe Rafael Jimenez, Jr
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JIMENEZ v. VALENZUELA
as 5:2013cv00108
Petitioner:
Joe Rafael Jimenez, Jr
Respondent:
LORI VALENZUELA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jimenez v. The State of Texas
as 5:2013cv00082
Petitioner:
Joe Rafael Jimenez, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Jimenez, Jr. v. Bexar County Sheriff's Dept, et al
as 12-51247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RAFAEL JIMENEZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, AMADEO ORTIZ, ROGER DOVALINA and others
Jimenez v. State of Texas
as 5:2012cv01124
Plaintiff:
Joe Rafael Jimenez, Jr
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joe Jimenez, Jr. v. Bexar County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 12-51016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RAFAEL JIMENEZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, AMADEO ORTIZ, ROGER DOVALINA and others
Joe Jimenez, Jr. v. Scott Simpson, et al
as 12-50907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RAFAEL JIMENEZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SIMPSON, CHRISTINE E MCKEEMAN and HOPE ANDRADE
US v. Pacheco-Medina
as 12-2029
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYSA PACHECO
Interested Party:
RAFAEL JIMENEZ-MENDEZ, PABLO VALENTIN-TORRES and GREGORIO DIAZ-GONZALEZ
Joe Jimenez, Jr. v. Jason Clark
as 12-50859
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE RAFAEL JIMENEZ, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JASON CLARK, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inspector General
US v. Castro
as 12-1890
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALDO CASTRO
Interested Party:
GREGORIO DIAZ-GONZALEZ, PABLO VALENTIN-TORRES and RAFAEL JIMENEZ-MENDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
