Cases 1 - 10 of 40
United Specialty Ins. Co., Inc. v. Romero Portillo et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Josue Rafael Romero Portillo and Lego Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
USA v. Segura
as 23-20027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Rafael Romero Segura, also known as Demetrio Segura-Romero
United States of America v. Romero (Santos)
as 22-3213
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rafael Romero and Albert Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellant:
Rafael Santos
United States of America v. Olivo (Clase)
as 21-874
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Clase
United States of America v. Olivo (Edwin Romero)
as 19-4053
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Romero
United States of America v. Olivo (Anibal Gonzalez)
as 19-3684
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anibal Gonzalez
United States of America v. Romero
as 19-3645
Defendant:
Albert Rodriguez and Rafael Santos
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rafael Romero
WARK et al v. VIDA TRAINING CENTER, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv23881
Defendant:
MARIA T. BARRANCO and VIDA TRAINING CENTER, LLC
Plaintiff:
JESUS RAFAEL ROMERO and EDMUND PATRICK WARK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Romero v. United States of America
as 18-2368
Petitioner:
Rafael Romero
Respondent:
United States of America
United States of America v. Olivo (Romero)
as 18-2026
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Olivo, AKA Pito, Rafael Romero, Francis Paluzzi and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Romero
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
