Cases 1 - 10 of 36
(PS) Singh v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2025cv01138
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and David Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Singh v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv03294
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Garcia and CDCR
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Singh v. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv03149
Defendant:
Christian Pfeiffer and Robert St. Andre
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Singh v. CDCR, et al.
as 2:2024cv03148
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Singh v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2024cv03147
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Defendant:
C. Jenkins, Robert St. Andre, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Singh v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv03150
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Jeff Macomber
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Singh v. Brace
as 2:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Defendant:
Danny Brace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Singh v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Singh v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv02392
Defendant:
J. Russell Cunningham, Byron Z. Moldo, Gabriel Liberman and others
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(HC) Singh v. Macomber
as 2:2024cv00881
Petitioner:
Raghvendra Singh
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
