Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Transformative Justice Coalition et al v. Raffensperger
as 1:2020cv04869
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger
Plaintiff: Transformative Justice Coalition, Black Voter's Matter Fund, The Rainbow Push Coalition and others
Intervenor Defendant: Georgia Republican Party and Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20501
Lane v. United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff: Anthony P. Lane
Defendant: United States, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainbow Push Coalition et al v. Deal et al
as 1:2013cv03635
Plaintiff: Rainbow Push Coalition , Herman Smith and The Estate of James Christopher Johnson III
Defendant: Nathan Deal and Samuel S. Olens
Intervenor: GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cncl Tree Comm Inc v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2036
Petitioner - Appellant: CNCL TREE COMM INC, BETHEL NATIVE CORP and MINORITY MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL
Respondent - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
Intervenor-Defendant - Intervenor Respondent: CTIA WIRELESS ASSN and T MOBILE USA INC
Not Party - Intervenor Respondent: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, Verizon Wireless
Not Party - Proposed Amicus Respondent: ATLANITC WIRELESS LP, BARAT WIRELESS LP, KING STREET WIRELESS LP and others
Not Party - Proposed Intervenor Respondent: LEAP WIRELESS INTL INC
Not Party - Amicus-petitioner: ANTARES HOLDING LLC, ASIAN AMER JUSTICE CTR, BENTON FNDTN and others
Muhammad v. Jackson et al
as 2:2008cv00369
Plaintiff: Elijah Muhammad
Defendant: Jessie Jackson, Jessie Jackson, Jr, Rainbow Push Coalition and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Riches v. Bush et al Featured Case
as 1:2007cv04192
Defendant: Marshall Bruce Mathers, III, Usama Bin Laden, Darryl F. Zanck Institute for Media Domination and Talmudic Studies, The and others
Plaintiff: Johnathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Session, et al v. Perry, et al
as 2:2003cv00354
Plaintiff: Walter Session, Morris Byers, Frenchie Henderson and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Eddie . Jackson, Barbara Marshall, Gertrude Fisher and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Democratic Congressional Intervenors, County of Travis, Texas, Texas State Conference of NAACP Branches and others
Defendant: Rick . Perry, Tom Craddick, David Dewhurst and others
Consolidated Defendant: State of Texas and Tina Benkisar
Petitioner: Sheila Jackson Lee, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Brennan Center for Justice at NYW School of Law and others
Amicus Curiae: Norman S Primus, University Professors Concerned about Equal Representation for Equal Numbers of People, Ellen Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prometheus Radio v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-3388
Not Party - Petitioner: PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECT
Not Party - Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Intervenor: FOX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC, FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC, NBC INC and others
Not Party - Proposed Amicus-Appellee: MICHAEL M. EPSTEIN
Not Party - Proposed Amicu: NEIL ELLIS, MONTEREY LICENSES and MID WEST MANAGEMENT INC
Rainbow Push Coaltn v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 02-1020
Appellant - Appellant: Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
Appellee - Appellee: Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor: Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., Sinclair Acquisition X, Inc., Sinclair Acquisition VII, Inc. and others
Terminated Party: Sullivan Broadcasting Company III, Inc.
Rainbow Push Coaltn v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 01-1072
Appellant - Appellant: Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
Appellee - Appellee: Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor: Curators of the University of Missouri

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?