Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Monighan et al v. Christopher et al
as 1:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Monighan, Brodie Monighan, Lydia Monighan and others
Defendant:
David E. Christopher, Gregory Millbrand, Chad Runkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gosain v. State Bank of India
as 19-2539
Defendant / Appellee:
Texplas India Private Ltd.
Defendant:
State Bank of India, New York Branch, as Successor to Bank of India Flushing Branch and State Bank of India (Mumbai)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rajiv Shah Gosain
GOSAIN v. REPUBLIC OF INDIA et al
as 1:2018cv02427
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA and REPUBLIC OF INDIA
Plaintiff:
RAJIV SHAH GOSAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Anderson et al v.Eight Fahrenheit, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02177
Plaintiff:
Kyle Anderson and Dominick Soto
Defendant:
Eight Fahrenheit, Inc. and Rajiv Shah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
MCKINNEY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, RAJIV SHAH, PRESIDENT JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSARO v. SHAH
as 3:2017cv01670
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MASSARO
Defendant:
RAJIV SHAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MASSARO v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2013cv06958
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MASSARO
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI, SOLIMAN, ALLEN MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
