Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,447
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00550
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff: D. DIAZ
Defendant: MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00898
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramirez-Isales v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 3:2024cv05304
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ramirez-Isales
Defendant: Walgreen Co. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff: Yvonne Ramirez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Berg, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2433
Respondent: KRIZIA BERG, GRACE BRYANT, NOELANI DEL ROSARIO-SABET and others
Petitioner: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff
Ramirez v. C. R. England, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00820
Plaintiff: Victor Ramirez
Defendant: C. R. England, Inc. and Does through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Ramirez Aponza v. Garland
as 24-2421
Petitioner: OCTAVIO ENRIQUE RAMIREZ APONZA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sivak v. Ramirez, et al.
as 24-2395
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: RAMIREZ, Sergeant, ISCI, AARON FODGE, Prison Employee, R. FINDEISEN, Prison Employee and others
Sylve v. Uyematsu et al
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff: Cheyanne Sylve
Defendant: Carly Rose Uyematsu and Samuel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?