Cases 1 - 10 of 20
McGraw v. Hobbs et al
as 1:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Ray Naylor, Terrie L Banister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon McGraw v. A Weekly, et al
as 14-3244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
A Weekly, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Doby Algernon, Inmate, ADC #95824, Gatlin, Ms., Mental Health, Grimes Unit, ADC and others
McGraw v. Weekly et al
as 1:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
A Weekly, Doby Algernon, Gatlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Roger Cameron, Chism and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon McGraw v. Edward Adams, et al
as 14-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Captain Edward Adams, W.C. Dub Brassell Detention Facility, Jefferson County Jail, Pine Bluff County Jail, Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare, Mental Healh Department and others
McGraw v. Jefferson County et al
as 5:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Edward Adams and Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw v. Deberry et al
as 5:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Surrell Deberry , Joseph Perdue , Greg Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw v. Adams et al
as 5:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Edward Adams and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGraw v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Barry Sims, Kent Krouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon McGraw v. Berry Sims, et al
as 11-2859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Berry Sims, Pulaski County Circuit Judge, Kent Krouse, Public Defender, Gary Arnold, Saline County Circuit Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
